Program

Dose & schedule design


The schedule is the blockbuster

Every approved drug has a label dose and an administration schedule. Both were chosen under constraints — protocol convenience, regulatory caution, comparator parity — that have nothing to do with maximising clinical benefit. The blockbuster form of an existing asset is usually a schedule away.

We search the joint space of dose, interval, titration shape, and patient-stratifier covariates against the coupled body. The output is the Pareto frontier of efficacy versus toxicity, and the schedule families that dominate the label.

Indications we have worked

  • Tarlatamab (SCLC, DLL3×CD3 BiTE): cytokine-release-syndrome envelope under schedule variants the DeLLphi-301 protocol did not test
  • Teriparatide (osteoporosis): 24-month BMD trajectories under non-daily schedules
  • GLP-1 agonists: weekly versus daily versus titrated against weight-loss durability and GI tolerability
  • Anti-tau monoclonal antibodies (Alzheimer’s): schedule envelopes pre-clinical with paper-anchored cohorts

A note on individuality

We do not claim personalised medicine in the closed-loop sense. Schedules are calibrated for covariate cohorts — genotype, baseline biomarker, organ function — not for individual real-time response. That distinction matters and we are explicit about it in every engagement.

Disclaimer. This note is a methodology and capability description, not medical or clinical advice. Modelled outputs are not substitutes for peer-reviewed evidence, regulatory review, or qualified clinical judgement. Raganele is not a medical practice.
Engage

Send us an asset.
We’ll send back a schedule.

A trial protocol, a candidate molecule, a withdrawn product with a question attached. If it touches the wired body — and most things do — we can tell you what the counterfactual sweep returns.

Start a conversation