Dose & schedule design
The schedule is the blockbuster
Every approved drug has a label dose and an administration schedule. Both were chosen under constraints — protocol convenience, regulatory caution, comparator parity — that have nothing to do with maximising clinical benefit. The blockbuster form of an existing asset is usually a schedule away.
We search the joint space of dose, interval, titration shape, and patient-stratifier covariates against the coupled body. The output is the Pareto frontier of efficacy versus toxicity, and the schedule families that dominate the label.
Indications we have worked
- Tarlatamab (SCLC, DLL3×CD3 BiTE): cytokine-release-syndrome envelope under schedule variants the DeLLphi-301 protocol did not test
- Teriparatide (osteoporosis): 24-month BMD trajectories under non-daily schedules
- GLP-1 agonists: weekly versus daily versus titrated against weight-loss durability and GI tolerability
- Anti-tau monoclonal antibodies (Alzheimer’s): schedule envelopes pre-clinical with paper-anchored cohorts
A note on individuality
We do not claim personalised medicine in the closed-loop sense. Schedules are calibrated for covariate cohorts — genotype, baseline biomarker, organ function — not for individual real-time response. That distinction matters and we are explicit about it in every engagement.